Service Alert
There are various checklists librarians and others have created for evaluating information (you may have heard of the CRAAP Test).
However, evaluating news stories, social media posts, and other content you find online or IRL requires a different strategy than what you may have learned before.
Rather than just looking at the information itself, use the SIFT Method described below to learn more about the source of the information to determine whether it's worth spending the time to analyze the information further to determine whether it's credible.
For more information, check out our guide to combatting misinformation on social media.
Do you know the website or source of information? Check your bearings and consider your purpose.
Know the expertise and agenda of your source. Look up your source in Wikipedia. Consider what other sites say about your source. Open multiple tabs and explore.
Look for the best information on a topic, or scan multiple sources to find out what the consensus is. Use Ctrl + F to find specific words.
Find the original source to see the context, so you can decide if the version you have is accurately presented.
At this stage in your academic career, evaluating scholarly sources requires less work than evaluating other types of information. This is because scholarly sources are created for audiences with more specialized knowledge than what you're likely to have at this point.
This doesn't mean that every academic journal article is appropriate for your research, so here are some questions to consider when evaluating scholarly sources:
The number one rule for reading a scholarly article is that you don't have to read every word of every article that seems like it might be relevant. Follow these steps or check out the video below to learn how you can efficiently read scholarly articles for your research: